[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: More PATH fallout. Who decided this was a good idea?



On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 11:51 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday 07 December 2008 11:31:54 Enrico Scholz wrote:
> > Both 'vipw' and 'ldapadd' are official and documented tools to manage
> > user database.
> 
> vipw I believe is forbidden due to its ability to circumvent auditing of user-
> subject binding. 

Perhaps I'm a bit slow this morning, but vipw is forbidden but
vi /etc/passwd isn't?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]