[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora QA ? - Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora
- From: Sven Lankes <sven lank es>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Fedora QA ? - Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:03:00 +0100
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:02:30AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Sometime it is better to push directly to stable, when the package is
> already broken, when it is a security fix, or for packages with few
> users.
Which then leads to the question, why a broken package was pushed to
stable in the first place.
We should try to get the bohdi-karma-mechanism more popular. I have
updates-testing activated on both my F10 machines but I haven't set a
single karma-point yet. The reason is that it's not easy after a day or
two to review that last updates and send a +1 on them if I have used
them and they didn't break.
Maybe a small gui tool showing the latest testing-updates and allowing
to send (positive) bohdi-karma would encourage more people to actually
send the karma which in turn would encourage developers to use
updates-testing more.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: sven lankes net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]