[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The looming Python 3(000) monster



On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:05 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> 2008/12/9 Toshio Kuratomi <a badger gmail com>:
> > So let me reiterate:
> >
> > * python-3.x will not be in Fedora-11 unless it becomes obvious in the
> > next few weeks that we absolutely must be running it for the next release.
> > * we need more experience with python-2.6+ & python-3 compatibility
> > before we decide whether parallel versions of python are necessary.
> >
> > .. _[1]: http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README.txt
> >
> > -Toshio
> 
> 
> Well again. Some people (like Toshio) seem to have a grasp on the
> matter. All this banter hasn't produced anything more of use. How
> about forming a temp SIG to take care of this trusting they do the
> right thing?

As opposed to the Python SIG that already exists?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet gmail com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]