[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The looming Python 3(000) monster



2008/12/9 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet gmail com>:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:05 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> 2008/12/9 Toshio Kuratomi <a badger gmail com>:
>> > So let me reiterate:
>> >
>> > * python-3.x will not be in Fedora-11 unless it becomes obvious in the
>> > next few weeks that we absolutely must be running it for the next release.
>> > * we need more experience with python-2.6+ & python-3 compatibility
>> > before we decide whether parallel versions of python are necessary.
>> >
>> > .. _[1]: http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README.txt
>> >
>> > -Toshio
>>
>>
>> Well again. Some people (like Toshio) seem to have a grasp on the
>> matter. All this banter hasn't produced anything more of use. How
>> about forming a temp SIG to take care of this trusting they do the
>> right thing?
>
> As opposed to the Python SIG that already exists?

No. Seems like the ideal body to come to a decision and let the rest
of us know.


-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]