Fedora QA ? - Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Thu Dec 11 17:41:50 UTC 2008


Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 17:52 +0100 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:08 +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:58:51AM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > 
> > >> We should try to get the bohdi-karma-mechanism more popular. 
> >  
> > > IMNSHO we should get rid of it -- there is already one very good 
> > > mechanism for registering bugs in the software and it is 
> > > bugzilla.
> > 
> > Which can cater for negative feedback. I don't think most people would
> > be too happy with bz-entries created just containing 'works for me'.
> But this is exactly what is happening.
> 
> Cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475943
> for a real world case.

Huh? This does not look like positive feedback to me but like a normal
bug report.

> ... no matter which karma a package would get, it would still be the
> maintainer who overrules.

+1. Let's get rid of karma automatism, at least no enabled by default.
> 
> Ralf

Regards,
Christoph




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list