Re: yum --skip-broken update by default?

["Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta gmail com>]

2008/12/11 Dr. Diesel <dr diesel gmail com>:
> Its not really a problem to simply add --skip-broken when something is
> broke.  But I'd be OK with yum automatically using the --skip-broken
> feature, explaining what is broke at the end, then asking if it is ok to
> report it anonymously.

That seems like a reasonable trade-off. IF we can set up an anonymous
drop point that we can easily turn off its being abused with spam.

Don't forget to wrap that in UI for PK as well.

-jef