[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: yum --skip-broken update by default?
- From: "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta gmail com>
- To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: yum --skip-broken update by default?
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:36:22 -0900
2008/12/11 Dr. Diesel <dr diesel gmail com>:
> Its not really a problem to simply add --skip-broken when something is
> broke. But I'd be OK with yum automatically using the --skip-broken
> feature, explaining what is broke at the end, then asking if it is ok to
> report it anonymously.
That seems like a reasonable trade-off. IF we can set up an anonymous
drop point that we can easily turn off its being abused with spam.
Don't forget to wrap that in UI for PK as well.
-jef
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]