[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Making updates-testing more useful





On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Christopher Stone wrote:

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta gmail com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal fedoraproject org> wrote:
In general skip-broken is probably going to need to be the default for these
Yes, having skip-broken notify users of the problems its going to skip
over, and not silently skip would make me feel better. There will be a

--skip-broken is borked, I used it the other day with the PackageKit
problems, and skip-broken tried to pull in a bunch of .i386 deps (I
don't have any .i386 rpms installed on my system).  It did manage to
skip the broken rpms, but it also tried to pull in a bunch of .i386
rpms as well which is obviously wrong.


I bet it is not wrong. the i386 packages probably provide what was required. They just provide it sub-optimally.

-sv


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]