[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: nautilus depends on a lot of stuff via gvfs



On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:10 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> Matthias Clasen píše v Út 09. 12. 2008 v 20:42 -0500:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 01:18 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > So my proposal is to split nautilus into nautilus-core, that will
> > > > contains the content of the current nautilus package, and nautilus
> > > > "meta" package that will contains all the dependencies plus dependency
> > > > on nautilus-core. This solution will install all the deps as today, but
> > > > leave the option to remove the unnecessary packages afterwards.
> > > > 
> > > > Only 3 packages will be affected with this split
> > > > nautilus-devel
> > > > nautilus-python
> > > > seahorse-plugins
> > > > and they should be made to depend on nautilus-core instead of nautilus.
> > > > 
> > > > I will file a bug with the proposed change to nautilus spec file.
> > > 
> > > That's not workable. You'd probably rather rejigger the samba packages
> > > so it's possible to use Samba in any appropriate environment without
> > > dragging in the server, or the excessively big packages. You should do
> > > the same for other dependencies.
> > > 
> > > Removing functionality from nautilus as it is installed by default won't
> > > fix that problem.
> > 
> > Fwiw, I don't think it is a big problem to change things so that gvfs
> > subpackages are pulled in by comps instead of by hard deps from
> > nautilus, as long as they are all in the default install. I don't
> > introducing a nautilus metapackage for this purpose is necessary or a
> > good idea. 
> > 
> 
> Yes, pulling the deps via comps could be a nice solution.

Done, in 2.25.2-1


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]