RFC: Description text in packages
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Tue Dec 16 18:57:58 UTC 2008
Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 12:36 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 12:02 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit :
> >> And those would be what buttons again?
> >
> > Those would be whatever the maintainer of your xkb layout wants them to
> > be. Adding this stuff to an xkb layout is not rocket science and has
> > been possible for a long time.
>
> So one of they keys on my keyboard should do something other than what I
> expect?
Bzzt. On an average keyboard, about 50% of the alt-ed space is not
marked and let to the implementators discretion. Without going into
Canadian six-level key complexity, four-level xkb layouts are the norm
and I dare you to find a keyboard where all four levels are marked.
> Then you're not writing human text, you're writing computer code.
> Huh?
No efforts are expended by console maintainers to make it keep up with
the curreent demands of human text. Its target is “debugging things gone
wrong” ¹
¹ “I know the discussions I've had with distributions on these subjects
they are thinking X is the user interface full stop, except for
debug/things gone wrong.” (Alan Cox, 2008-12-01).
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081216/7ce60bd5/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list