Proposed PackageRenaming guideline

[Jochen Schmitt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dennis Gilmore schrieb:
> from memory yes.  you need a re-review  then to EOL the old
> package.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife
> and
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages
>  hint at it.  We should make it crystal clear  :)

Hast this was the practice in the past. The disadvance of this process
is the fact, that a re-review
takes a long time.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklKkKMACgkQT2AHK6txfgxbBACePue+re0NVyyJ2tc9d1R5UBAF
S7UAoLI3q0E0iM9QUU0+P6z4+BBIZb2X
=cytl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----