Proposed PackageRenaming guideline

[Jochen Schmitt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jason L Tibbitts III schrieb:
>>>>>> "JS" == Jochen Schmitt <Jochen at herr-schmitt.de> writes:
>
> I think you mean "can take a long time".  I have done re-reviews
> for renames in an hour because someone asked me to.  Typically a
> re-review is much quicker than the initial review.
>
My last experience was, that the re-review has taken a long time.
> As discussed on IRC, an important benefit of a re-review is the
> insurance that the Obsoletes and Provides are done properly.  It is
>  easy to get this wrong, so another pair of eyes in the process is
> a good idea.
I agree with you, I have propose a lightwight review for check this
point in
a bugzille ticket record as an insurance that this statements are right.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklKk3MACgkQT2AHK6txfgwhfACgixEK2QJULUFkw/qPlX6QkHLq
WHQAoJSyBFQk/uwm0urjbsa3FIt/h8Yd
=vmke
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081218/afabd7aa/attachment.htm>