Amarok 2 on F9

[John5342]

2008/12/19 Dr. Diesel <dr.diesel at gmail.com>

>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 2008/12/19 Bob Arendt <rda at rincon.com>:
>> > Oscar<Soker> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Plz don't do that, Amarok 2 is not as goog as Amarok 1.4 it loose a lot
>> of
>> >> functionality
>> >>
>> > +1
>> > Amarok 2 is missing some this 1.4 has:
>> >  doesn't have UMS media player support.  Bug 473807
>> >  doesn't ship documentation. Bug 473522
>> > *Please* do not "upgrade" f9 to Amarok2
>>
>> We don't vote on mailing lists.  If you would like to use a particular
>> package version though, we do have alternatives:
>
>
>
> Have you been sleeping the past few days?  How about the call/vote from the
> Fedora group on Nautilus?
>

And that thread is a prime example of _why_ we don't vote on mailing lists.

-- 
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and
those who don't...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081219/dce371c0/attachment.htm>