[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20081220 changes



On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 04:28:38PM +0100, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 
> I also didn't find the rules fuzzy, but - they read:
> 
> == snip ==
> 
> You must use one of the following formats:
> 
> * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> - 0.6-4
> - And fix the link syntax.
> 
> * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> 0.6-4
> - And fix the link syntax.
> 
> * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>
> - 0.6-4
> - And fix the link syntax.
> 
> == snip ==
> 
> And while these three variants only differ in the way the
> version-release is specified, I can't see how from that follows that
> the rest is free form? Maybe I'm missing something, but all three
> clearly use simple dashes for each stanza of the changelog entry.

If I recall well, the FPC ruling was not about anything else than 
the version release format. I didn't found any trace of that, though.
That being said it is indeed unclear from the guideline that only 
the date and version-release is specified here.

--
Pat


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]