[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Usage of {_libdir} or {_lib} in noarch packages



On Saturday 20 December 2008 06:57:52 am Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:50:37AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:36 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > Wouldn't it be better to let rpm set _libdir/_lib to match noarch
> > > package requirements?
> >
> > What should it set it to? It has no knowledge of where the noarch rpm
> > package will eventually be installed. Should we assume that /usr/lib is
> > always correct (how Debian of me to even suggest this)?
>
> Isn't the norach equivalent of _libdir _datadir? Or phrased in another
> way: Shouldn't a noach package avoid both lib and lib64? I think we
> even have rules already set for this.
>
> I don't quite agree that rpm should start changing _libdir to point
> to _datadir, but the packagers should probably patch up the packages
> to use _datadir instead of _libdir if the package is indeed noarch.

All python noarch libraries go in /usr/lib.

-- 
Conrad Meyer <konrad tylerc org>



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]