[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Older kernel shipped as F7 kernel update?



On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> /me is a bit puzzled
> 
> On "28 Jan 2008 22:14:47 -0700" kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7 was shipped as
> update:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00968.html
> 
> Some minutes ago on "02 Feb 2008 02:01:59 -0700" kernel-2.6.23.14-60.fc7
> was shipped as update:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00061.html
> 
> $ rpmdev-vercmp 2.6.23.14-64.fc7 2.6.23.14-60.fc7
> 0:2.6.23.14-64.fc7 is newer
> 
> Epochs involved? No doesn't look like it:
> rpm -qp kernel-2.6.23.14-60.fc7.i686.rpm --qf '%{EPOCH}\n'
> 
> Was is 2.6.23.14-64.fc7 revoked? Never shipped properly? Ohh, no, some
> servers carry it:
> http://ftp.stw-bonn.de/pub/fedora/linux/updates/7/i386/kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7.i686.rpm
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/7/i386/kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7.i686.rpm
> 
> /me wonders how long the letter will remain there
> 
> Bodhi error?

Ah, thanks for catching this.  It looks like kernel-2.6.23.14-60.fc7 was
in updates-testing for a while, was never obsoleted when -64 came in,
and was "approved" by the security team when that feature came about
recently (which requests that an update be pushed to stable).

Looks like some new features confused bodhi a little.  This shouldn't
happen again, as bodhi will now auto-obsolete older pending/testing updates.

I've obsoleted -60, and kicked off another mash of f7-updates.

luke


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]