rpms/java-1.7.0-icedtea/devel java-1.7.0-icedtea-jhat.patch, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.30, 1.31
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Tue Feb 5 18:32:51 UTC 2008
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:46:34 -0500
fedora-extras-commits at redhat.com (Lillian Angel (langel)) wrote:
> Author: langel
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/java-1.7.0-icedtea/devel
> In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16892
>
> Modified Files:
> java-1.7.0-icedtea-jhat.patch sources
> Log Message:
> Uploaded new sources and updated patches.
...snipp...
> diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31
> --- sources 8 Jan 2008 20:38:45 -0000 1.30
> +++ sources 5 Feb 2008 17:46:23 -0000 1.31
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> ce13ee63357a699ad327d362230cc2f5 java-access-bridge-1.19.2.tar.gz
> abee6aad1525bee3d45a13d0adf859c9 mauve-2007-09-12.tar.gz
> 254bfa2360efb5374439f9b1738c7b22 openjdk-b24-fedora.zip
> -2c1183cef14826c55ae13bc8c56e2e9d icedtea-1.5.tar.gz
> 7a0c160c03012cd40957a7a112e25038 mauve_tests
> +337b0f3d04749df35f54747618e599ca icedtea-1.5.tar.gz
>
I'm a bit confused by this... Upstream has a icedtea-1.5.tar.gz that
they released on Jan 3rd.
This version (also called 1.5) has a number of changes to it...
I suggest either:
- If this is a svn snapshot or something, use that versioning and pull
the svn version.
- If this is local changes, use the upstream 1.5 version and apply a
patch with your local changes?
Or am I missing something here?
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080205/16db1445/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list