[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: a plan for updates after end of life



On Saturday 09 February 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:35:14PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> >> What real use is that? The point of relying on some after-EOL-mainenance
> >> is to be able to extend the life for some definite time.
> >
> > It is better than nothing, and it would be wrong to advertise something
> > wrong. As a side note, it is the same for Fedora, packages may be
> > orphaned within the timespan of the release.
>
> If a package is orphaned within the release timespan but a security
> exploit is subsequently published that affects the shipped version,
> would the users be left on their own to fix it?

no the security team would get a fix out there.

Dennis


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]