a plan for updates after end of life
Horst H. von Brand
vonbrand at inf.utfsm.cl
Mon Feb 11 21:39:54 UTC 2008
Arjan van de Ven <arjan at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:04:22 +0100
> Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
[...]
> > Does this looks like a plan acceptable by the Fedora lead?
> > Opinions, comments?
> My first impression is... "ok so there's now a formal process, and the
> result is that there is no branch ever that uses this". The chances of
> finding sufficient capable volunteers for even the base package set
> is... near zero.
In calculus they called this number \epsilon ;-)
> I stress "capable" here, and with this I mean people who
> both have the time and the skill to track, evaluate and backport security
> fixes. That is a non-trivial amount of time and skill *for each
> package*. Most people with these skills don't themselves use these older
> distros -> they lose interest fast. Or in other words; I'm sure there is
> demand for this sort of thing, I just don't think there's sufficient
> volunteer supply...
There just seems not to be enough /real/ demand to keep it running for a
reasonable amount of time. The demand is more a "it sure sounds nice to be
able to run the same Fedora for 5 years, in case the versions in between
turn out duds", but very few really contemplate suffering such outdated
stuff; and in my experience people who run old versions are also the same
who don't ever apply any updates.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list