[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Summary of the 2008-02-12 Packaging Committee meeting



Was there no discussion of Haskell? or did I miss the log of the
meeting where this happened?

On 12 Feb 2008 14:16:45 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs math uh edu> wrote:
> Meeting minutes and full logs of the packaging committee meeting which
> occurred on 2008-02-12 are online:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes20080212
>
> Executive summary:
>
> No new guidelines this week.
>
> Issues pending FESCO ratification:
>  * Guidelines for packages using ggc-client-libs
>   * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/GGZ
>   * Accepted (7-0)
>
> Misc business:
>
>  * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OpenOffice.orgExtensions
>   * spot will present FPC's questions to Caolan.
>
>  * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Lisp
>   * No response so far to abadger1999's questions.
>   * FPC is a bit short on Lisp expertise so any outside assistance
>     would be appreciated.
>
>  * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java
>   * That's all we have for Java guidelines; we would really like to
>     have more.
>   * Java-knowledgeable folks are desparately needed to help us cook up
>     some useful guidelines for Java.
>
>  - J<
>
>
>
> --
>   Jason L Tibbitts III - tibbs math uh edu - 713/743-3486 - 660PGH - 94 PC800
>        System Manager:  University of Houston Department of Mathematics
> And with death The knowledge comes It was the life all along We'd been afraid of
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]