[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: INT_MAX undeclared / limits.h (was: Re: Fedora i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-02-09)



On Wed February 13 2008, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:

> GCC4.3 introduces a new header structure that is meant to be more
> streamlined, and therefore more efficient for the preprocessor step of
> compiling.  This means that headers that were once implicitly included
> (like limits.h) are not included anymore, unless they absolutely have to. 
> Although this is somewhat unusual, it is entirely compliant with the C99
> and C++98/TR1 standards, and it is always a best practice to explicitly
> include headers.

Thank you for this wonderful explanation. The bug (missing include) is already 
fixed in rawhide and reported upstream.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]