[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Git has too many freaking dependencies



Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:

Not to bicker of the potential naming, but how about just calling it
git-meta so there is no ambiguity.

I think there's plenty of ambiguity in "git-meta". If the intent is to install all git-* with this, call it "git-all", "git-everything" or just drop the whole metapackage and set up a git comps group.

+1


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]