On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 15:42 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > I don't think anyone cares quite that much about agg anymore ;) > > I guess that the gnash maintainer in OLPC cares, maybe the former owner > also cares (though it is not that clear). It appears gnash can use agg or cairo, but the developers prefer agg. Is there a reason for this? (Apparently there's an OpenGL renderer too) Everything else in the universe has been moving to cairo, why do we need a duplicate project? I suppose its because agg is C++ and apparently so is gnash. Still, bleh.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part