[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Auto rebuild release bump issue



On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 13:17 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:30:57 +0100
> Michael Schwendt <mschwendt gmail com> wrote:
> 
> > > In this case I have gdl 0.9-0.pre6.fc9.  It got bumped to 
> > > 0.9-1.pre6.fc9.  It should be 0.9-0.pre6.fc9.1.  
> > 
> > However, it should have been
> > 
> >   0.9-0.1.pre6%{?dist}
> >       ^^
> >       (!)
> > 
> > to begin with, not
> > 
> >   0.9-0.pre6%{?dist}
> 
> that is correct.  Your original scheme did not follow the guidelines,
> thus the bumper didn't deal with it as if it were a pre-release.
> Please follow the guidelines next time.

I have also noticed that all the jpp based java packages have been
updated incorrectly, and those are following the fedora jpackage package
naming guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/JPackagePolicy


> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]