[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Auto rebuild release bump issue



On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:32:00 -0500, Matt Wringe wrote:

> > > > In this case I have gdl 0.9-0.pre6.fc9.  It got bumped to 
> > > > 0.9-1.pre6.fc9.  It should be 0.9-0.pre6.fc9.1.  
> > > 
> > > However, it should have been
> > > 
> > >   0.9-0.1.pre6%{?dist}
> > >       ^^
> > >       (!)
> > > 
> > > to begin with, not
> > > 
> > >   0.9-0.pre6%{?dist}
> > 
> > that is correct.  Your original scheme did not follow the guidelines,
> > thus the bumper didn't deal with it as if it were a pre-release.
> > Please follow the guidelines next time.
> 
> I have also noticed that all the jpp based java packages have been
> updated incorrectly, and those are following the fedora jpackage package
> naming guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/JPackagePolicy

And still nobody has said what script was used to bump the spec files.
The one in cvs/fedora originally came from either notting/sopwith and was
improved for the fedora extras mass-rebuilds. It could be enhanced to
support the jpp scheme and also add a "bump-least-significant" fallback
for any "invalid" versioning schemes. But if a different and secret script
is used, that's not helpful.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]