[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: someone interested in packaging VirtualBox?

On Sunday 24 February 2008 16:20:44 Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:09:11PM +0100, Christoph H?ger wrote:

> > what do you exactly mean with "too ugly to live"? Is it that fragile bad
> > code or does it just not fit the kernel styling guidelines?
> In terms of accessing hardware virt capabilities, there is already a
> generic kernel module to expose hardware virtualization driver to userspace
> apps - it is called KVM.  If virtualbox needs access to hardware virt them
> it should use this existing driver.

VirtualBox does not need hardware virt capabilities, maybe it can use them, 
but the authors state that VirtualBox is faster without using hardware 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]