[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: mono-core conflicts



On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:47:53 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:

> 
> Debarshi Ray píše v Po 25. 02. 2008 v 01:55 +0530:
> > Trying to install mono-devel on Fedora 8 x86_64 leads to a transaction error:
> > 
> > #  yum -y --enablerepo=fedora --enablerepo=updates install mono-devel
> > [...]
> > Dependencies Resolved
> > 
> > =============================================================================
> >  Package                 Arch       Version          Repository        Size
> > =============================================================================
> > Installing:
> >  mono-devel              x86_64     1.2.5.1-3.fc8    updates           1.6 M
> >  mono-devel              i386       1.2.5.1-3.fc8    updates           1.6 M
> > Installing for dependencies:
> >  mono-core               i386       1.2.5.1-3.fc8    updates            12 M
> > 
> > Transaction Summary
> > =============================================================================
> > Install      3 Package(s)
> > Update       0 Package(s)
> > Remove       0 Package(s)
> > 
> > Total download size: 15 M
> > [...]
> > Transaction Check Error:
> >   file /usr/bin/smcs from install of mono-core-1.2.5.1-3.fc8.i386
> > conflicts with file from package mono-core-1.2.5.1-3.fc8.x86_64
> > 
> > Error Summary
> > -------------
> > 
> > Is this worth filing a bug? I could not find something similar in
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?product=Fedora&version=&version=7&version=8&component=mono&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=FAILS_QA&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&bug_status=PASSES_QA&bug_status=CLOSED&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=
> 
> It looks like that mono-core package is not multi-lib aware. It contains
> some native shared libs (/usr/lib*/*.so) that should go into -libs
> subpackage or mono-core should be added to some kind of multi-lib black
> list.

RPM explicitly complains about /usr/bin/scms, and if it sees a conflict in
/usr/bin that is evidence of the file not being a binary executable:

  $ file /usr/bin/smcs 
  /usr/bin/smcs: Bourne shell script text executable

In that case, afaik, the file must be identical on all platforms. But
it isn't:

$ diff -u smcs.i386  smcs.x86_64 
--- smcs.i386   2007-11-09 22:40:45.000000000 +0100
+++ smcs.x86_64 2007-11-09 22:25:25.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 #!/bin/sh
-MONO_PATH="/usr/lib/mono/2.1/:$MONO_PATH" exec /usr/bin/mono $MONO_OPTIONS /usr/lib/mono/2.1/gmcs.exe -pkg:silver -langversion:linq "$@"
+MONO_PATH="/usr/lib64/mono/2.1/:$MONO_PATH" exec /usr/bin/mono $MONO_OPTIONS /usr/lib64/mono/2.1/gmcs.exe -pkg:silver -langversion:linq "$@"


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]