[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Again about status of p2p-software in Fedora.



2008/2/29, Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov gmail com>:
> 2008/2/29, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones redhat com>:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:46:14PM +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>
>
> > I'm still waiting for someone to provide the requested information for
>  >  this BZ:
>  >
>  >  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143#c4
>  >
>  >  I'm hearing an endless series of complaints about mldonkey being the
>  >  "killer app" which requires we rebuild the whole OCaml world to cater
>  >  for its whims, but no one can be bothered to update this BZ.
>
>
> Let's wait until someone resolves situation with p2p-software in
>  common. It's completely useless to review this request if
>  eMule-related software doesn't allowed in Fedora.
I don't agree with this "wait state". You need to split the FE-Legal
question from the review question. If ever the package couldn't be
allowed in Fedora, then i'm sure we can find a solution so the spec
(and the work) won't get lost.

Of course an advice would be welcome to solve the question about
inclusion of p2p software in Fedora. (with the hope that it will make
appear an approvable spec within the next minute!?)

Nicolas (kwizart )

>  --
>  With best regards!
>
>
>  --
>  fedora-devel-list mailing list
>  fedora-devel-list redhat com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]