[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: system-* tools' ui independence



On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 15:19 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2008-02-29, 09:23 GMT, Trond Danielsen wrote:
> > The SHMConfig option is only needed to access additional 
> > configuration options, but basic functionality is available 
> > without any modifications to xorg.conf.
> 
> Just to note that SHMConfig is explicitly WONTFIX — developers 
> don’t like it because of its terrible security implications.

Well, we need the functionality *somehow*. If SHMConfig is insecure,
then we really need to find another way to do it...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]