On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 15:19 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: > On 2008-02-29, 09:23 GMT, Trond Danielsen wrote: > > The SHMConfig option is only needed to access additional > > configuration options, but basic functionality is available > > without any modifications to xorg.conf. > > Just to note that SHMConfig is explicitly WONTFIX — developers > don’t like it because of its terrible security implications. Well, we need the functionality *somehow*. If SHMConfig is insecure, then we really need to find another way to do it...
Description: This is a digitally signed message part