[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Policy proposal for compatibility packages



On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 23:53 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Anybody can already raise his concerns about a compat package, why more
> procedures and such a veto power for a particular packager?

For the reasons spelled out in the proposal: 'The reasoning for the
latter is that even if the primary maintainer is not maintaining the
compatibility package, chances are that they will have to be involved in
the maintenance due to passing along security problems, helping out with
things and redirecting misfiled bugs.'

/B 
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple fedoraproject org>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]