Pulse Audio 0.9.8 - upgrade?

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:31:58 -0700
Richi Plana <myfedora at richip.dhs.org> wrote:

> That depends on which distro you're talking about and what the distro
> progenitors mean by stable. If you mean "stable" as in "no feature
> changes, just improvement in the way things run and security releases"
> as used by a lot of server distros including RHEL and Solaris, then
> *MAYBE* 0.9.8 isn't a reason. But if by "stable", they simply mean it
> crashes less or is just about equal", then it's fine to release a
> package. Specially if the distro is about introducing cutting-edge
> features and the previous release was actually a little short on
> features (a'la NetworkManager < 0.7).
> --

There is a (big) difference between introducing cutting-edge features
during development to have them during the release, vs introducing
cutting-edge releases as an update to an already released Fedora.  BIG
difference.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080110/aaffa9f8/attachment.sig>