[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: compilation architecture



2008/1/13, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan underwood gmail com>:
On 13/01/2008, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar gmail com> wrote:
> I would expect different services to also cause some performance
> penalties. I doubt OpenSUSE uses SElinux for one. This is a selling
> point for Fedora.
>

This thread makes for interesting reading on the overhead of SElinux:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/6/14

Even with that patch, SElinux seems to incur a 25% overhead on simple
file open/close. Not sure if that's since been adressed, or if I am
misinterpretting the data given.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

I have SELinux disabled because of many problems.

--
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
http://liviopl.jogger.pl/
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]