[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

spotlight in fedora 8



I didnt understand what is the 4 th software written in message 7 and 8
thank you



On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 12:00 -0500, fedora-devel-list-request redhat com
wrote:
> Send fedora-devel-list mailing list submissions to
> 	fedora-devel-list redhat com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	fedora-devel-list-request redhat com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	fedora-devel-list-owner redhat com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-devel-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal (Ralf Corsepius)
>    2. Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow (Stefan Grosse)
>    3. Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal (Kevin Fenzi)
>    4. Re: anaconda - unhandled exception (Jeremy Katz)
>    5. Re: compilation architecture (Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek)
>    6. Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow (Jos? Matos)
>    7. Re: SpotLight into fedora (Zoltan Boszormenyi)
>    8. Re: SpotLight into fedora (subhodip biswas)
>    9. Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) (Mike McGrath)
>   10. Re: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) (subhodip biswas)
>   11. Re: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) (Jesse Keating)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:25:00 +0100
> From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>
> Subject: Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> 	<fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1200396300 5174 158 camel beck corsepiu local>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 23:46 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > 2)  Triage team looks at bug report, determines if dupe or
> > insufficient information exists to solve it. If there is not enough
> > information in the bug, then triage team puts the bug in NEEDINFO.  As
> > you will see below, this state has a finite life cycle associated with
> > it.
> I am having doubts the bug triage team will be able to judge on whether
> a PR is legitimate or not but on trivial cases. 
> 
> I.e. I would expect them to end up spam essentially filtering.
> 
> > 3)  Assuming bug survives through the triage team, it changes state to
> > ASSIGNED
> 
> To whom? 
> 
> IMO, the real problem is getting a competent volunteer involved who is
> likely sufficiently knowledgeable about a particular issue. i.e. to
> communicate such issues, such that a volunteer can take action when _he_
> wants.
> 
> That said, I consider lack of communication and "bug arbitration" to be
> the actual flaw behind current bug tracking workflow in Fedora.
> 
> Ralf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:12:24 +0100
> From: Stefan Grosse <singularitaet gmx net>
> Subject: Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> 	<fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <200801151712 24830 singularitaet gmx net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"
> 
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008 04:15:58 pm Jos Matos wrote:
> JM>   No problem here both on fc8 with Jindich texlive packages and lyx as
>  well 
> JM> as with rawhide.
> JM>
> JM>   It runs fast and I do not notice any difference from tetex in terms of
> JM> speed.
> 
> Thanks, so it seems a problem with kile?
> 
> Stefan
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:24:52 -0700
> From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin scrye com>
> Subject: Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal
> To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <20080115092452 245d5604 ghistelwchlohm scrye com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:46:36 -0500
> jonstanley gmail com ("Jon Stanley") wrote:
> 
> > Well, it was a great session at FUDCon.  A lot came out of it, and I'm
> > going to put some of them down here. The work flow suggested below I'd
> > a FESco vote on, since it really affects you guys.  
> 
> Great. You might want to use (optional) 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/FESCoProposalTemplateDraft
> and write up a page for FESCo to refer to for this. 
> 
> > This work flow was
> > discussed between myself, John Poelstra, and Will Woods at the Sunday
> > hackfest, and we agree that this is the correct way to move forward,
> > however, we want community input and buy-in on this, since it has
> > pretty far-reaching consequences.
> 
> Sorry I couldn't make it on sunday... had to catch a plane. ;) 
> 
> > Here is the lifecycle of a bug:
> 
> ...snipp...
> Looks great to me. 
> 
> > Note that at any step of the above process, the maintainer can "fast
> > track" the bug, and change it to ASSIGNED.  The triage team is not
> > going to look at bugs that are not in NEW or NEEDINFO state.  On the
> 
> What if the bug is put in NEEDINFO(maintainer) by the reporter?
> Ie, they have provided info or need to ask the maintainer about
> something, but the maintainer isn't responding? Are those closed? 
> They probibly shouldn't be... 
> 
> > flip side of that, it is not a maintainer's responsibility to look at
> > bugs that are in NEW any longer.  They can focus their energy on the
> > bugs that are ASSIGNED to them.
> > 
> > Also, maintainers should not be allowed to set priority on bugs.
> > Setting severity is fine.  Only QA or releng should set priorities.
> > This allows us to look at things in a sane manner (which is impossible
> > now since severity and priority fields come from /dev/urandom
> > seemingly), and possibly lessen the reliance on blocker bugs (though
> > blockers are useful in their own right, so don't think that we are
> > going to eliminate them any time soon).
> 
> I'm not sure how usefull this will be. Maintainers pretty much ignore
> priority now, as reporter (or any package maintainer) can set it... 
> 
> > It was also decided that when a bug is in NEEDINFO for one month, it
> > will be closed.  Maintainers would need to realize that putting a bug
> > in NEEDINFO is putting it on the fast track for closure.
> 
> What about the above case of NEEDINFO(maintainer)? 
> 
> > I think that's all that I have to say on this topic right now, let me
> > know if I'm missing anything or this is complete hogwash :)
> 
> I think this is great! ;) 
> I'd be happy to help with triage... 
> 
> > -Jon
> 
> kevin
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080115/804c8a2b/signature.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:27:29 -0500
> From: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
> Subject: Re: anaconda - unhandled exception
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> 	<fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1200414449 3433 4 camel aglarond local>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 08:45 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > > Keep it up Jeremy, ya bout got it licked!
> > 
> > Not to be a jerk or anything, but you're aware at least five other
> > people work on anaconda, right? 
> 
> And I'm not even really around this month (other than sporadic looking
> at email).  Luckily, we've got a team of other rock stars these days[1]
> helping out on anaconda these days and it doesn't all just fall to me
> anymore.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> [1] And have for a while at this point.  Keep up Mike! :-)
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:31:04 +0100
> From: "Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek" <jakub rusinek gmail com>
> Subject: Re: compilation architecture
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> 	<fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Message-ID:
> 	<5e92ee3f0801150831t685810f1jb2ac41c7975a1675 mail gmail com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Installing openSUSE again would complicate my life. Again.
> But if it's so necessary, I can install it one more time.
> 
> My hardware and configuration?
> 
> http://www.smolts.org/show_all?UUID=c8dbb9d3-a9bd-4ba6-b92e-4a294ba5a95f
> 
> -- 
> Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
> http://liviopl.jogger.pl/
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080115/df91a460/attachment.html
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:32:39 +0000
> From: Jos? Matos <jamatos fc up pt>
> Subject: Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow
> To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <200801151632 39422 jamatos fc up pt>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"
> 
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:12:24 Stefan Grosse wrote:
> > Thanks, so it seems a problem with kile?
> 
>   That seems strange, nevertheless try to run pdflatex from the command line 
> and see what is going on. I would expect kile to be not guilty here and the 
> command line will point where the problem is...
> 
> > Stefan
> 
> -- 
> Jos Ablio
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:41:24 +0100
> From: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor freemail hu>
> Subject: Re: SpotLight into fedora
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> 	<fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <478CE234 3090901 freemail hu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek rta:
> > Not the same. SIMILLIAR.
> 
> Sure you meant "Silmarillion".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:14:24 +0530
> From: "subhodip biswas" <subhodip fedoraproject org>
> Subject: Re: SpotLight into fedora
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> 	<fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Message-ID:
> 	<539333cb0801150844o2e34bffcob66745345002b16f mail gmail com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> ah ... sorry i forgot to mention that .. thanx for reminding
> 
> On Jan 15, 2008 10:11 PM, Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor freemail hu> wrote:
> > Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek rta:
> > > Not the same. SIMILLIAR.
> >
> > Sure you meant "Silmarillion".
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > fedora-devel-list redhat com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> Subhodip Biswas
> 
> GPG key : FAEA34AB
> Server : pgp.mit.edu
> http://subhodipbiswas.wordpress.com
> http:/www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SubhodipBiswas
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:47:38 -0600 (CST)
> From: Mike McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com>
> Subject: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd)
> To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <alpine LFD 1 00 0801151047230 2987 laptop mmcgrath net>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> What are the plans for media support for Fedora 9?
> 
> 	-Mike
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:32:33 +0100
> From: Heinrich Winther Christensen <hwc dsb dk>
> To: webmaster fedoraproject org
> Subject: Where are the CD ISO's?
> 
> Hi...
> 
> My old but useful server doesn't have DVD, so I desperately need ISO's
> for CD's.
> Where will I find them?
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> -- 
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> Fedora-websites-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:23:21 +0530
> From: "subhodip biswas" <subhodip fedoraproject org>
> Subject: Re: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd)
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> 	<fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Message-ID:
> 	<539333cb0801150853j6f417db2q4027fffbf54e93d3 mail gmail com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Yeah .. this is a good issue .. many of fedora user here stick to
> older version because cd iso in unavailable .... and live cd does not
> serve their purpose ..
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> Subhodip Biswas
> 
> GPG key : FAEA34AB
> Server : pgp.mit.edu
> http://subhodipbiswas.wordpress.com
> http:/www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SubhodipBiswas
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:53:15 -0500
> From: Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>
> Subject: Re: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd)
> To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <20080115115315 0307581e redhat com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:47:38 -0600 (CST)
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com> wrote:
> 
> > What are the plans for media support for Fedora 9?
> 
> Generating split media as part of the official compose process.  Alpha
> will see DVD + split CD media.
> 
> -- 
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080115/55daba84/signature.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
> End of fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 47, Issue 105
> **************************************************


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]