[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal



On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:36 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 1:59 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com> wrote:
> 
> > So... this conflicts with the RHEL workflow, in that NEW is used
> > for 'no one is looking at this', and ASSIGNED means 'someone is
> > on the hook for that'. I'd prefer something like:
> >
> >   UNCONFIRMED -> NEW -> ASSIGNED
> 
> Yep, but we don't currently have an UNCONFIRMED state.  One thing that
> we didn't know was whether or not you could assign different initial
> states per product - so that RHEL bugs don't wind up in UNCONFIRMED,
> etc.
> 
> > If no one is currently looking at it, I think 'NEW' conveys that
> > better to the user than 'ASSIGNED'.
> 
> It does, but like John said, we were looking to launch with a minimal
> amount of effort and retooling, and using what we already had.

(I'm usually just a lurker on discussions like this, but I couldn't
resist.)

NEW -> CONFIRMED -> ASSIGNED ?

> 
> 
-- 
                Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]