[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Proposed SIG: Windows MinGW cross-compiler SIG

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:15:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I've got a self-building, mostly working set of Fedora packages for
> the MinGW cross-compiler (no optional libraries yet).  You can get the
> spec files and instructions by doing:
>   hg clone http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel

What primarily concerns me is that plan around keeping this in sync
with patches/updates to the main gcc, binutils, libpng, libgcrypt,
gnutls, etc RPMS already in Fedora.

The idea of maintaining 2 near identical specs & builds for all these
packages isn't that nice, particularly since many of these are security
sensitive packages

|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]