[RFC Fedora 10] kill pam_console
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Wed Jul 9 19:23:36 UTC 2008
We've carried both pam_console and HAL-based ACL support for a while
now. It's time to cut the cord and remove pam_console, so we only
have one way of setting device permissions to worry about.
Here's the list of packages that still contain pam_console configuration
that would need migrated:
pam (tmraz at redhat.com)
/etc/security/console.perms.d/50-default.perms
em8300 (ville.skytta at iki.fi)
/etc/security/console.permbs.d/60-em8300.perms
jfbterm (mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
/etc/security/console.perms.d/60-jfbterm.perms
libmtp (triad at df.lth.se)
/etc/security/console.perms.d/60-libmtp.perms
libnjb (triad at df.lth.se)
/etc/security/console.perms.d/60-libnjb.perms
thinkfinger (silfreed at silfreed.net)
/etc/security/console.perms.d/60-thinkfinger.perms
vdr (ville.skytta at iki.fi)
/etc/security/console.perms.d/95-vdr.perms
dfu-programmer (weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu)
/etc/security/console.perms.d/dfu-programmer-at89c51.perms
/etc/security/console.perms.d/dfu-programmer-at90usb.perms
piklab (cgoorah at yahoo.com.au)
/etc/security/console.perms.d/icd2.perms
/etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
/etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
These all seem like they'd be reasonable to fix. Does anyone
see this as a problem?
Bill
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list