No answer to easy bug policy
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Sat Jul 12 08:48:57 UTC 2008
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 09:12:50AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 02:04 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > There are several occasions where the individual maintainers are still
> > active and working on some software packages while not fixing trivial
> > bugs on other software packages.
>
> Surely the maintainer in question knows the package well enough to
> decide whether to merge patches? For instance, I might push a patch
> upstream and hold off applying it to fedora as it's trivial and will get
> updated at the next version bump of my package in a few weeks.
But you can mention it on the patch, so that the reporter knows what is
happening. Or close UPSTREAM. Also I have added a 3 weeks delay before
this is started. This leads to 3 weeks + 1 month time.
> This all seems so very beurocratic to me.
It is. But burocracy is required when it comes to forcing other
contributors.
--
Pat
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list