[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: No answer to easy bug policy



Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:59:24AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 02:04:47AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance
I have hopefully adressed th ecomments, by stating that this is a policy
for bug fixes, not easy bug as such. Also added a 3 weeks delay before
the procedure is started, precise a bit what is a bug easy to fix and
put explicitely the cleaning of blocker bugs on the reporter.

Still on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance

Instead of orphaning, what about adding comaintainers? That makes for more responsibility on the part of the person who thinks that the bug is an easy fix to evaluate this in terms of correctness, the future effects of the patch, and what is going on upstream.

This would be separate from any other policy allowing people to fix EasyFix+evaluated correct bugs (like mschwendt's spec file cleanups.)

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]