[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: No answer to easy bug policy



On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:42 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> What I'm asking is instead of:
> 
> "If you don't answer after 2 weeks, a reminder should be sent, and if 
> not answered within a further 2 weeks the package will be orphaned 
> according to the policy stated at"
> 
> We could have:
> 
> "If you don't answer after 2 weeks, a reminder should be sent, and if 
> not answered within a further 2 weeks My_Username will be assigned as a 
> comaintainer and can make changes according to the policy stated at"

Instead of creating a bunch of different ways to "timeout" a maintainer
and "do something" after the fact, why can't we just fix up the
non-responsive policy?  I'd rather have one policy than n+ for each
situation.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]