[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Calling on Fedora/RedHat ML managers to clean up Fedora-list.



On Jul 28, 2008, Andrew Haley <aph redhat com> wrote:

> It surely was on-topic here to talk about whether unfree binary blobs
> should be included in Fedora.

+1

I wonder why nobody's complaining about all this traffic on this
non-technical thread on a list that people complained was supposed to
be restricted to technical content.  Heck, why was the discussion even
started here?  Double standards, as usual?

> Do we really want to say that if any ethical question arises during
> discussion on Fedora lists, people may not address it?

Seems like that's the general feeling of those who demand silence
about it.  Perhaps a separate list named "fedora-truth" or
"fedora-ethics", for this kind of discussion, would make it clear
enough that truth and ethics are not welcome on other lists.

Or maybe the support list should be named fedora-immoralist ;-P :-D

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member       ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]