[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Networkmanager service is shutdown too early



On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 09:42 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
>> Dan Williams wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 19:47 +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 01:46:42PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 13:41 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> >>>> Dan Williams (dcbw redhat com) said:
>> >>>>> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:54 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
>> >>>>>> During the boot I have some samba shares mounted because I have them
>> >>>>>> configured to mount via fstab file.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> When I shutdown or reboot I get a screen for 2-3 minutes that shows
>> >>>>>> smbfs service trying to unmount samba shares but NM service has
>> >>>>>> already shutdown and there is no working network connection :(
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I have seen this "bad" behaviour in F8 and have reported it on this
>> >>>>>> mailinglist, but I hoped that the new and smarter NM would take care
>> >>>>>> of it, but unfortunately it didn't :(
>> >>>>> Probably need to adjust the stop priorities of NM and haldaemon to be
>> >>>>> right after messagebus (K85) rather than where they currently are...
>> >>>>> The problem is that NM is being stopped to early.
>> >>>> 'After netfs' should be good enough. Although netfs stop should possibly
>> >>>> do lazy umounts.
>> >>> Ok, just need to bump NM a few bits later it looks like; might as well
>> >>> be K84 to be right after messagebus.
>> >> Why not go all the way to 90 as network to be on the safe side? With a
>> >> quick look I can see some scripts that might not be happy if the network
>> >> is down with a priority above 84, racoon/dund/rdisc/rpcgssd/nasd for example.
>> >
>> > NM depend on messagebus at least, so we should stop NM right before
>> > messagebus.  But the same issues with startup are theoretically present
>> > with shutdown, meaning that since messagebus depends on rsyslog, and
>> > rsyslog depends on network.  Standard installs don't use networked
>> > syslog, so standard installs don't actually need rsyslog to depend on
>> > network, but because rsyslog isn't smart enough to know when it does or
>> > does not depend on network, we can't just re-order the chain... :(
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>>
>> Dan what is the conclusion about this bug? This is a looong thread but
>> nothing is updated on bugzilla page so is there some consensus on what
>> needs to be done?
>
> I will move NetworkManager shutdown to be right before dbus.
>
> Dan

Will this happen as an Fedora 9 update or just in rawhide (fedora 10) ?

Cheers,
Valent.



-- 
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]