rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-ptracefix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-trapsfix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-INSTALL_ARCH_DIR.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-linux.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec, 1.46, 1.47
Dennis Gilmore
dennis at ausil.us
Sun Jun 8 18:34:43 UTC 2008
- Previous message (by thread): rkhunter aborting
- Next message (by thread): rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-ptracefix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-trapsfix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-INSTALL_ARCH_DIR.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-linux.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec, 1.46, 1.47
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Sunday 08 June 2008, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Tom Callaway wrote:
> > Author: spot
> >
> > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9
> > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8037
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec
> > Added Files:
> > java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-ptracefix.patch
> > java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-trapsfix.patch
> > java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-INSTALL_ARCH_DIR.patch
> > java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-linux.patch
> > Log Message:
> > enable sparc/sparc64 builds
>
> Please submit significant patches like this to Lillian and I for approval
> before committing them, along with an explanation. I'd prefer to make this
> change in Rawhide unless there's a compelling need for it in Fedora 9.
>
> This isn't the first time a cvsextras member has committed a non-trivial
> patch to the OpenJDK packages without asking. This makes me second-guess
> my decision to facilitate trivial patches by allowing cvsextras members
> commit access. Maybe I misinterpreted the spirit of the "cvsextras group
> members can commit" flag. I thought it was designed for checkin
> convenience, but that non-trivial patches were still commit-after-approval.
> If not, I'll just uncheck the flag and manually commit OpenJDK patches
> after I've approved them.
>
> Tom
Tom,
Im assuming you are talking about my commit
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2008-April/msg02319.html
as the other cvsextras person to have touched java-1.6.0-openjdk package. I
looked though the list archives and other than commits by lillian, lkundrak
and yourself its the only other commit since the package was created. I
worked with lillian as i was developing the changes to add support to the
spec file to build using the zero engine it was done as part of Secondary
Architectures as defined http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures This
commit is part of the same effort. Fully integrating the asm that sun
released to enable java to work natively on sparc architectures. These
patches need to head upstream. I planned to work with Lillian this week to
ensure that they do. We can now build openjdk for 32 and 64 bit sparc linux.
previously the patches that went upstream only allowed 32 bit to be built.
We are still getting F-9 completely built so we need these patches commited
to F-9 so we can build the latest java-1.5.0-gcj since it uses the javadoc
from openjdk to build the documentation which in turn will let us build the
rest of the java applications.
Regards
Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080608/d6d289ea/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): rkhunter aborting
- Next message (by thread): rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-ptracefix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-trapsfix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-INSTALL_ARCH_DIR.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-linux.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec, 1.46, 1.47
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list