[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Retiring Opyum



On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:51 PM, David Timms <dtimms iinet net au> wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip <at> kanarip.com> writes:
>>>
>>> Would a "Obsoletes: pirut" have been more accurate and appropriate here?
>>
>> There's both an Obsoletes and a Provides, the Obsoletes makes sense, the
>> Provides not really, and it causes issues like this.
>
> It would sort of make sense to be able say in a spec:
> Provides: pirut(functionality)
> ie equivalent functionality = gui package management
> rather than the pirut(api) ?

Obsolete: pirut -> pirut is dead, this replace pirut, other apps that
depends on pirut - break their dependencies
Provides: pirut -> pirut is still alive, this package now include
pirut, other apps that depend on pirut - retain dependencies

>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>



-- 
Mohd Izhar Firdaus Bin Ismail
Amano Hikaru
天野晃 「あまの ひかる」
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MohdIzharFirdaus
http://blog.kagesenshi.org
92C2 B295 B40B B3DC 6866 5011 5BD2 584A 8A5D 7331


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]