non responsive policy with invalid mail
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Tue Jun 10 20:40:56 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 22:27 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> I believe phone numbers are exposed to the FAS admins, maybe FESCo &
> Board might need to be considered for cvsextras and cla_done
> respectively.
I can already see that information as part of my role for Fedora Legal.
I'd prefer to keep access to that to as few people as possible, but I'd
be happy to do lookups as needed for FESCo/Board.
~spot
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list