documenting process for packages renamed upstream

Karsten 'quaid' Wade kwade at redhat.com
Sun Jun 15 19:29:00 UTC 2008


On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:13 +1000, Jens Petersen wrote:
> Is the process for renaming packages in fedora that have been renamed 
> upstream document on the wiki?  I haven't been able to find any 
> description of our process in that case.
> 
> I think it happens often enough that the process should be written down.
> As I understand it a new package review is not required in the case but 
> cvsadmin requests are needed to create the new package.

If you don't find this, can you draft a page under User:Petersen,
then ... well, I suppose you submit it to the Packaging SIG?  I think
that group all have ACLs to update Packaging(.*).

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080615/4d04cc27/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list