file dependencies and packages and [blocker] bugs
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Tue Mar 4 04:45:46 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 13:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl) said:
> > Basicly: yes
> > Because:
> > -adding a Requires: /usr/share/fonts/foo/bar.ttf line to my package is trivial
>
> ... and causes additional megabytes to be downloaded for every transaction.
hyperbole. My view on this: the *.ttf deps un-hid a flaw in current yum
transaction handling.
> Note that actually addding these files to the repodata *breaks any dependency
> solver that tries to use it.
I don't see this. If this breaks depsolvers, these depsolvers are
broken.
> * Which is why it can't really happen.
?!?
> > -games were designed with a certain look and feel, depending on getting that
> > exacy font, fontconfig is somewhat fuzzy with which font you'll get
>
> It is? You ask for liberationsans, you get liberationsans.
>
> > -maintaining patches against each new upstream release for dozens of packages
> > is not trivial, and that little snipped will have to be incorperated and
> > maintained seperately for each of those dozens of apps
>
> It's like porting to PAM or NSS instead of reading /etc/passwd by hand. You want
> to integrate with the system, *you use the system libraries*. It's not about
> what's easiest for the maintainer.
It's about what the packages want, not about you want to packages to use.
Ralf
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list