F8 kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8

[Benjamin Kreuter]

On Friday 07 March 2008 11:15:40 Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
> Uh... If we waited until all the known bugs were fixed, we'd never release
> *any* kernel... :)
>

Perhaps I chose the wrong words.  What I intended to say is, why are we 
releasing kernels that break key things like network drivers or suspend, 
especially after we put so much effort into getting those things to work?

> Despite this kernel making my own iwl4965 unusable, I was fully in favor of
> releasing it. In theory, we fixed more problems than we caused, and you're
> always welcome to keep running the prior kernel. (I'm actually running a
> slightly modified 2.6.24.2-7.fc8 now).

Perhaps I should pay more attention to the kernel development, before 
commenting on it.  I'm still running a 2.6.23.9 kernel, because it is the 
most recent version that does what I need.

-- Ben

>
> --
> Jarod Wilson
> jwilson at redhat.com



-- 
Message sent on: Fri Mar 7 12:11:25 EST 2008
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080307/4faac987/attachment.sig>