[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: default partition scheme without /home - why ?

2008/3/10 Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>:
> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 13:34 +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote:
>  > Is that on purpose and if it why?
>  Guessing how much space you'll need in your non /home partitions over
>  time is difficult.  Only you know how your install will be used.  That's
>  why the installer defaults to the easiest thing to guess;  How much boot
>  space you'll need, and how much swap space.  However since you know how
>  your install is going to be used, you are best to make those estimations
>  and setup your /home as you want it.
>  --
>  Jesse Keating
>  Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Fedora Live CD target audience are desktop users, right? I as a
desktop user haven't seen any need for / partiton over 8-10 GB.
Servers, and other fedora usages may need some other partition schemes
but a default home user has huge benefits from a dedicated /home

It is probable that new users aren't aware that /home partition as a
dedicated partition has advantages and it would be best if anaconda
makes the "smart" partition scheme in which /home is a separate
partition in LVM volume, or a logical partition. Separate home has
lots of advantages that you are aware of, so why not just change the
partition scheme to take advantage of that?


linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]