default partition scheme without /home - why ?
Brendan Conoboy
blc at redhat.com
Mon Mar 10 16:08:18 UTC 2008
Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
> Perhaps we could create a new option, like "Recommended layout for desktops,"
> that uses a reasonable estimate of what the partition layout should be. If a
> user wants to change that, they can (and they can always "review and modify"
> the partition layout), and they can always resize later if they need to. New
> users are often unsure of what the partition layout is, and unfortunately,
> they often fail to read the install guide.
People can always resize / later and add a /home. Every system needs a
/ but not every system needs a /home. Is there a strong technical
reason for a default /home? Would that same reason also apply toward a
separate /usr and /var and /var/tmp? Please, lets not get nostalgic for
SunOS 4 partitioning!
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc at redhat.com
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list