Fedora Development Process

Andrew Farris lordmorgul at gmail.com
Fri Mar 28 08:43:45 UTC 2008


Andrew Farris wrote:
> No, it meant F9 development was begun and rawhide was branched away from 
> F8 on that date; it meant rawhide could be messed with without effecting 
> F8.

Wow, sorry disregard this TV-while-typing nonsense (I should answer questions I 
think about and know the answer for).  I think that what you said Axel would be 
correct, in that dist-f10 should be available for packages to branch to after 
april 8 but rawhide will stay dist-f9 until release date.  But any changes made 
in 'rawhide' or dist-f9 branches would still effect f9.  But someone clearly 
needs to confirm what I just said...

-- 
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net
  gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list