is xorg.conf still needed

[dwight at supercomputer.org]

On Wednesday 30 April 2008 10:28:52 pm Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 19:29 -0800, dwight at supercomputer.org 
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 April 2008 01:13:27 am Matej Cepl wrote:
> > > The whole truth is that we are on the way towards Stateless
> > > Linux (which means here xorg.conf-less X), but we are not
> > > there yet. To be honest, the way is long and the question is
> > > whether we will arrive at Fedora 10 or later.
> > > ...
> >
> > Are we really? Upon what do you base that statement? I'd be very
> > interested in knowing more, because the Stateless Linux mailing
> > list looks rather inactive. Is there a roadmap? And what's the
> > current status?
>
> We're on our way to the Online Desktop, in which the operating
> system itself starts to barely matter at all. (Which should draw
> people to Linux since its cheap and reliable, right? :)

I don't believe it, but your reply doesn't answer my question. 
Where's the roadmap, and what's the plan for getting there? And 
who's in charge, and who's involved?

    -dwight-